Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Allen v. Peacock TV LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen
Defendant:
Peacock TV LLC, Regal Cinemas, Inc, Cinemark Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Iguade et al v. First Home Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
OSEGHAE IGUADE and MAURICE IGUADE
Defendant:
First Home Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Tessu v. AdaptHealth, LLC
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rita Tessu
Defendant:
AdaptHealth, LLC doing business as America's Healthcare at Home
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MAS Associates, LLC v. Venick et al
as 1:2022cv03195
Plaintiff:
MAS Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Venick, Apex Home Loans Inc., Celebrity Home Loans, LLC and others
Johnson v. Long Fence and Home LLLP
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Long Fence and Home LLLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Long Fence and Home LLLP
as 8:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Long Fence and Home LLLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Moyer et al v. Home Point Financial Corporation
as 1:2020cv03449
Defendant:
Home Point Financial Corporation and Maverick Funding Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sandra Moyer, Terry Patterson, Jr., Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
