Cases 1 - 10 of 34
District Court of Maryland for Prince George's County et al v. Hymes
as 8:2023cv02163
Plaintiff:
District Court of Maryland for Prince George's County, Policeman H. Colon and State of Maryland
Defendant:
Ronnie Hymes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Hymes v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 21-403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Saul R. Hymes
Defendant / Appellant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Kendell Hymes, Jr. v. Joline Wudtke, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDELL D. HYMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOLINE WUDTKE, sued as Dr. Juline
LaDawnda Smith, et al v. City of Youngstown, OH, et al
as 20-4228
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MALIK MOSTELLA, SOPHISTICATED LADY, LLC, dba Topsy's Lounge, OFFICER CARLOS RIVERA, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
LADAWNDA SMITH, In her individual Capacity and as Administratrix of the Estate of Deceased Ryan Weaver-Hymes
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. W., A minor, by and through her guardian, LaDawnda Smith
LaDawnda Smith v. City of Youngstown, OH, et al
as 20-4213
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MALIK MOSTELLA, SOPHISTICATED LADY, LLC, dba Topsy's Lounge, OFFICER CARLOS RIVERA, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LADAWNDA SMITH, In her individual Capacity and as Administratrix of the Estate of Deceased Ryan Weaver-Hymes
Bank of America, N.A. v. Hymes
as 20-3582
Respondent:
Saul R. Hymes and Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Amicus Curiae:
Office of The Comptroller Of The Currency
Petitioner:
Bank of America, N.A.
USA v. Scanvinski Hymes
as 20-10266
Defendant / Appellant:
SCANVINSKI J. HYMES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rodney Hymes
as 20-5905
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY HYMES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
