Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Day v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2021cv10991
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, ICE, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Dillia M. Day
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv10829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hachem v. IC System, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv13392
Plaintiff:
Haithem Hachem
Defendant:
IC SYSTEM, INC. , Franklin Collection Service, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lasha v. IC System, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00825
Plaintiff:
Althea Lasha
Defendant:
IC System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rogers v. IC SYSTEM, INC.
as 2:2014cv11681
Plaintiff:
Dana Rogers
Defendant:
IC SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Winnig v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv11013
Plaintiff:
Samuel Winnig
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Holdings, Incorporated, Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Groves et al v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10807
Plaintiff:
Ian Groves and Lynn Strauss
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Holdings, Incorporated, Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Spencer v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10625
Plaintiff:
Wilton E Spencer, Jr
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Holdings, Incorporated, Arctic Glacier, Incorporated and Home City Ice Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Palombella et al v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10623
Plaintiff:
Brandi Palombella and Joe Sweeney
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Holdings, Incorporated, Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
