Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Teri Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC, et al
as 22-35319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERI KEALOHA SAHM and TERI SAHM
Defendant / Appellee:
ONSLOW BAY FINANCIAL LLC, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC., DBA PHH Mortgage and others
Bushansky v. CorePoint Lodging, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging, Inc., Keith A. Cline, James R. Abrahamson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Keith A. Cline, James R. Abrahamson and others
Gorrell v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gene Gorrell
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Mitesh B. Shah, James R. Abrahamson and others
Whitfield v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Mitesh B. Shah, James R. Abrahamson and others
Wang v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Keith A. Cline, Mitesh B. Shah and others
USA v. Marquise Bowers
as 20-5484
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUISE J. BOWERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02090
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Onslow Bay Financial LLC, Merscorp Holding Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Teri K Sahm and Teri Kealoha Sahm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Connor v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05100
Defendant:
J Bowers, Department Head Smith, Anissa Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Valentina O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
