Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Fred Rahdar and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Kobra Ghorbani, City of Friendswood, B Milling and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Fred Rahdar, Kobra Ghorbani and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
B Milling, J Dement, M A Kulhanek and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Fred Rhadar, Kobra Ghorbani and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
City of Friendswood Texas, b milling, M Kulhanek and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Mitcham v. Talis Biomedical Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01039
Plaintiff:
Karen Mitcham
Defendant:
Talis Biomedical Corporation, Brian Coe, J. Roger Moody, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Modrak v. Talis Biomedical Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Modrak
Defendant:
Talis Biomedical Corporation, Brian Coe, J. Roger Moody, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Samuel Hendley v. J. Rogers, et al
as 21-1507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL HENDLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ROGERS, Prison Guard and M. MCLEAN, Grievance Counselor/ Prison Guard
USA v. Julian Rogers
as 20-13397
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIAN J. ROGERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Howard v. Shane Cheever, et al
as 20-1581
Defendant / Appellee:
Breena K. Efferetz, Pamela J. Rogers, Shane L. Cheever and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Howard Yennie, of the Yennie Family
Willie Rogers v. Lyneal Wainwright, et al
as 19-3834
Respondent / Appellee:
GOVERNOR MIKE DEWINE, LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden, GARY C. MOHR, ODRC Director and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE J. ROGERS, aka Otis Lee Rogers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
