Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3943
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES F. PEARSON
Frand v. First Energy Corp et al
as 2:2020cv04287
Defendant:
First Energy Corp, K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Chana Frand and CalPERS
Petitioner:
James J Durrett, Jr., The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement and IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS
Special Master:
Shawn K Judge
Interested Party:
Ebony Yeboah-Amankwah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant:
TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv03785
Defendant:
K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Owens and CalPERS
Petitioner:
IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS, The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and others
Interested Party:
Partners for Progress Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management Company (LUX), S.a.r.l and others
Special Master:
Shawn K Judge
Brighthouse Funds II - MFS Value Portfolio et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Brighthouse Funds II - MFS Value Portfolio and Brighthouse Funds - MFS Total Return Portfolio
Defendant:
FirstEnergy Corporation, Charles E. Jones, Michael Dowling and others
MFS Series Trust I et al v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv05839
Plaintiff:
MFS Series Trust I, MFS Series Trust IV, MFS Series Trust V and others
Defendant:
FirstEnergy Corp., Charles E. Jones, Michael Dowling and others
In re: James Pearson
as 23-304
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES F. PEARSON
Respondent:
DIANE OWENS and CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
James Buldas v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv03987
Plaintiff:
James Buldas
Defendant:
Does 1-10, K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones and others
Not Classified By Court:
gugliotta
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv03755
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
FirstEnergy Service Company, FirstEnergy Corp., Michael Dowling and others
Not Classified By Court:
gugliotta, Ohio Dept of Natural Resources, Ohio Dept of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hudock et al v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv03954
Defendant:
CHARLES E JONES, JON TAYLOR, First Energy Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
CAMEO COUNTERTOPS, INC, BRIAN HUDOCK and Cameo Countertops, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
gugliotta
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.