Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HABERKORN v. 1889 - CHS FOUNDATION, INC.
as 3:2023cv00093
Defendant:
1889 - CHS FOUNDATION, INC. formerly known as CONEMAUGH HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. doing business as CONEMAUGH HEALTH SYSTEM, CONEMAUGH HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., DUKE LIFEPOINT HEALTHCARE and others
Plaintiff:
TACEY HABERKORN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
ZAHRALDDIN-ARAVENA v. MCSTRAVICK
as 2:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL X. ZAHRALDDIN-ARAVENA
Defendant:
JAMES W. MCSTRAVICK and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
HASTON v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al
as 2:2020cv01069
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HASTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SALEHI v. POMPEO et al
as 2:2018cv05600
Plaintiff:
SAEED JABINI, D.J., ROYA SALEHI and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES #1-5, MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO and US DEPARTMENT OF STATE
GRABAR et al v. LENDINGUSA, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
JOYCE M. GRABAR and GARY GRABAR
Defendant:
LENDINGUSA, LLC , CRB GROUP, INC. , CROSS RIVER BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
GOEBEL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. PRECISE PAYROLL, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04775
Plaintiff:
GOEBEL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Defendant:
PRECISE PAYROLL, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TAIDOC TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. OK BIOTECH CO. LTD.
as 2:2012cv02566
Plaintiff:
TAIDOC TECHNOLOGY CORP.
Defendant:
OK BIOTECH CO. LTD. and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
