Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00087
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J Doll, US Patent and Trademark Office and Free-Flow Packaging International Inc
Respondent:
CMD Corporation
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00104
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J. Doll, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Free-Flow Packaging International, Inc. and others
PREGIS CORPORATION v. DOLL et al
as 2:2009cv05818
Plaintiff:
PREGIS CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL, UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, FREE-FLOW PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00094
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation and Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J. Doll, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Free-Flow Packaging International, Inc. and others
EXELIXIS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01431
Plaintiff:
EXELIXIS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01373
Plaintiff:
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
John Halvonik v. John Doll
as 09-5252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John P. Halvonik
Defendant - Appellee:
John J. Doll, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01330
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and KOSAN BIOSCIENCES INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Dome Patent L.P. v. Doll
as 6:2009mc06026
Plaintiff:
Dome Patent L.P. and Dome Patent L.P.
Defendant:
John J. Doll
Respondent:
Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated
GENENTECH, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01265
Plaintiff:
GENENTECH, INC. and GENENTECH, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
