Other Statutes Cases
USA v. Gomez
as 24-50201
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James Gomez
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 20-56349
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN HAWS, MATTHEW CATE, B. FLORES, Correctional Counselor I and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant: JAMES E. TILTON, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain
James Gomez v. Dylon Radtke
as 19-3061
Respondent: DYLON RADTKE
Petitioner: JAMES GOMEZ
Michael A Larry v. M L Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1997cv02649
Respondent: James Gomez, Dan Lungren and M L Smith
Petitioner: Michael A Larry, .
Defendant: Larry E Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gustavo A Ramirez v. State of California et al
as 5:2008cv01436
Respondent: Jerry Brown, California Department of Corrections, John W Gillis and others
Petitioner: Gustavo A Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouser v. White, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1993cv00767
Plaintiff: William Rouser
Defendant: Theo White , James Gomez , J. Yates and others
Amicu: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:1994cv02307
Plaintiff: John Armstrong , James Amauric , Richard Ponciano and others
Defendant: Joseph C. Sandoval , James Gomez , Kyle McKinsey and others
Amicu: USA and California Correctional Peace Officers Association
Miscellaneou: Edward Swanson
Receiver: Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrosio Villagrana v. James Gomez
as 09-72322
Petitioner: AMBROSIO VILLAGRANA
Respondent: JAMES GOMEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?