Cases 1 - 10 of 91
John D. Molloy et al v. Tiggle El et al
as 5:2023cv01070
Defendant:
Madalene Tiggle-Lockhart, Affiant Tiggle El, Madalene Charisse Tiggle-Lockhart and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Molloy, Charles J. Koosed, Matthew C. Perantoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bushansky v. Sumo Logic, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Sumo Logic, Inc., Sandra E Bergeron, Randy S Gottfried and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kraft v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, RICHARD M. KOV ACEVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zahava Rosenfeld v. Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Zahava Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Del Taco Restaurants, Inc., Joseph Stein, Valerie L. Insignares and others
Lalor v. Schulman et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert Lalor
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Coty Castellanos v. Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Coty Castellanos
Defendant:
Del Taco Restaurants, Inc., Lawrence F Levy, Eileen Aptman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KANG v. PayPal Holdings, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv06468
Plaintiff:
HUEI-TING KANG
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc, Daniel H. Schulman and John D. Rainey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
