Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Franklin v. Knowles
as 4:2021cv01941
Plaintiff:
Ephesian Johnny Franklin
Defendant:
Beyonce Giselle Knowles
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Indigo Williams, et al v. Phil Bryant, et al
as 19-60069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARDE GRAHAM, on behalf of her minor child, S.T., INDIGO WILLIAMS, on behalf of her minor child J.E., DOROTHY HAYMER, on behalf of her minor child, D.S. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM HAROLD JONES, in his official capacity as Member of the Mississippi State Board of Education, DELBERT HOSEMANN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Mississippi, BUDDY BAILEY, in his official capacity as Member of the Mississippi State Board of Education and others
Jeffrey Butts, et al v. Philip Gunn, et al
as 19-60063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA COX, JEFFREY BUTTS, LANE TOWNSEND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM HAROLD JONES, in Official Capacity as Member of the Mississippi State Board of Education, FRANK MCCLELLAND, in Official Capacity as Member of the Mississippi State Board of Education, WINONA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL BOARD and others
USA v. Ephesian Franklin
as 15-20622
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EPHESIAN JOHNNY FRANKLIN
Johnny Franklin Lawhon, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc (armstrong Contr, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82872
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc (armstrong Contr
Plaintiff:
Johnny Franklin Lawhon
Johnny Franklin Witherspoon, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83400
Plaintiff:
Johnny Franklin Witherspoon
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Johnny Franklin v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81612
Plaintiff:
Johnny Franklin
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
United States v. Franklin-El
as 07-3259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNIE FRANKLIN-EL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
