Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Chavez v. Garland
as 24-3489
Petitioner:
JOSE FERNANDO CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez Mireles v. Garland
as 24-3074
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS CHAVEZ MIRELES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Villatoro v. Garland
as 23-60559
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Chavez-Villatoro
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Jose Chavez-Gutierrez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11513
Petitioner:
JOSE EDUARDO CHAVEZ-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Flamenco v. Garland
as 22-1877
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-FLAMENCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 22-60567
Petitioner:
Jose Oscar Chavez-Dominguez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Aurorach Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02008
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Aurorach, Inc. d/b/a Touchdown Sports Grill, Jose Alfredo Chavez, OCTAVIO L AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
Chavez v. Tyson Foods
as 21-11110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maria Yolanda Chavez, Individually and on behalf of Minor LC and Estate of Jose Angel Chavez, Angel Chavez and Rita Elaine Cowan, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Thomas David Cowan
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyson Foods, Incorporated, doing business as Tyson Foods and Tyson Fresh Meats, Incorporated
USA v. Chavez
as 21-60008
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Chavez, also known as Big Head
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Martin Ruiz v. Miguel Marquez, et al
as 20-16962
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL MARQUEZ MARQUEZ, Guanajuato State Governor, MONSERRAT MARTINEZ SHOWS, Attorney, Secretary of Transparency and Render an Accounts of the Guanajuato State Government, ANGELICA RAMIREZ MORALEZ, Attorney, General Director of Labor, Subsecretary of Labor and Social Prevention and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
