Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Santos-Lema v. Garland
as 20-4060
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTOS-LEMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Santos-Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71354
Petitioner:
JUAN ALFREDO SANTOS-RAMIREZ, AKA Juan Santos-Ramirez, AKA Juan A. Santos-Ramirez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Juan Cruz v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73922
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTOS CRUZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
United States of America v. Valentin-Garcia (Mejia)
as 16-2715
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rolando Valentin-Garcia, AKA Trompu, AKA Rolando Valentin, David Acosta Ortega, Jose Tejada and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Luis Mejia
United States of America v. Valentin-Garcia (Mejia)
as 16-2678
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rolando Valentin-Garcia, AKA Trompu, AKA Rolando Valentin, David Acosta Ortega, Jose Tejada and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Luis Mejia
Nieto et al v. Jaidan Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05249
Plaintiff:
Ever Barranza, Wilmer Bustillo, Edwin Enamorado and others
Defendant:
Carlos Chicas, Juan Carlos Chicas, Jaidan Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Nolan v. Los Angeles City of, et al
as 2:2003cv02190
Plaintiff:
Dean Anderson, Roy P Ballesteros, Jason Lee Beatty and others
Unknown:
Attorney Settlement Officer Coordinator, Gregory G Petersen, Gregory G Petersen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Movant:
Helen Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Madrigal et al
as 5:2007cv05919
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan Santos Madrigal, Maria Elena Madrigal, Gloria Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
