Cases 1 - 10 of 329
Wong v. Breo Technology USA, LLC et al
as 5:2025cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tak Chuen Wong
Defendant:
Shenzhen Breo Technology Co., Ltd., Body Source Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Xue Jun Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02579
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zhang v. Garland
as 24-2900
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
YU JUN ZHANG
Bailey v. Cepton, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv07581
Defendant:
Takayuki Katsuda, Xiaogang Zhang, George Syllantavos and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Bailey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
USA v. Jose Charriez
as 24-2964
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE CHARRIEZ, a/k/a Jun
Fan v. Xiao-I Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv07837
Plaintiff:
Yunfan Fan
Defendant:
Wenjing Chen, Wei Weng, Zhong Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Shaw v. PDD Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06950
Defendant:
Jing Ma, PDD Holdings Inc., Lei Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Shaw
Petitioner:
Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. PDD Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06881
Defendant:
Jiazhen Zhao, Jing Ma, Lei Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund
Petitioner:
Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Coy Brookman v. WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv07553
Defendant:
LionTree Advisors LLC, Evercore Group L.L.C., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Coy Brookman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Baxter v. PDD Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05653
Defendant:
Jun Liu, Jing Ma, Lei Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Baxter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.