Cases 1 - 10 of 1,067
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nelson Da Costa-Lima, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1990
Petitioner:
NELSON JOSE DA COSTA-LIMA, ANA CLARA FERREIRA-LLIMA COSTA and E. F.-L. C.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Industrial Recycling & Demolition Inc v. Direct Connect Logistix Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Industrial Recycling & Demolition Inc
Defendant:
Direct Connect Logistix Inc, Hoosier Logistics L L C, P N M Transportation L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership et al v. U S Dept of Interior et al
as 6:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership, Century Exploration New Orleans L L C, Century Exploration Co and others
Defendant:
U S Dept of Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
J I A Inc v. Quality Staffing Network L L C
as 6:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
J I A Inc doing business as Jenkon
Defendant:
Quality Staffing Network L L C
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Calumet Shreveport Refining L L C v Regan
as 5:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Calumet Shreveport Refining L L C
Defendant:
Michael S Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
