Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Matt Schweder, et al v. Andrew Beshear, et al
as 21-6153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATT SCHWEDER, Individually and as Father and Guardian of P.S., ROBIN HARBOLT, Individually and as Guardian of P.H., LARRY NICHOLS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE AND JOHN DOES, 1-100
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Individually and officially as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, STEVEN STACK, Individually and in his official capacity as Kentucky Department of Public Health Commissioner,, ERIC FRIEDLANDER, Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, and others
Richard McLeod v. Mike Dewey, et al
as 21-11788
Defendant / Appellee:
EUGENE OWEN, ED MELTON, JOHN ULM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Booth Family Trust v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated , Martin S. Craighead , Gregory D. Brenneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rovner v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv03416
Plaintiff:
Marc Rovner
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr., Martin S. Craighead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Nichols v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-03140
Plaintiff:
Larry Nichols
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh v. Mixon et al
as 2:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
Defendant:
Jessie Arthur Mixon, Jr, Larry Nichol, Larry Nichol and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
