Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Latwahn McElroy v. Does, et al
as 21-55910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY, AKA E. J. McElroy, AKA Jabbari McElroy, AKA Jarbor McElroy
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, RN/DA, R&R Medical Technician, Doctors Assistant and Supervisors, DOE, Medical Admin., Supervisor of Due Process Requirements, R&R PROPERTY ROOM CLERK AND SUPERVISOR, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Legal property Room and others
Latwahn McElroy v. Gomez, et al
as 21-16410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER GOMEZ, FACILITY SERGEANT BJORK, DOE, Clinic Physician; NKSP Physician and others
Latwahn McElroy v. Gomez, et al
as 20-16453
Defendant / Appellee:
GOMEZ, Corrections Officer, LUNA, Building 5 Floor Officer, DOE, NKSP Physician and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. Maureen McLean, et al
as 20-16586
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. SAYRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. USDC-CAOAK
as 20-72378
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LATWAHN MCELROY, M. SAYRE, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Petitioner:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. Adam, et al
as 19-16382
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM, RN, Pelican Bay State Prison
Defendant:
PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON, Medical Dept. & Dental Dept. and OLSEN, Med. Analyst
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY, AKA E. J. McElroy
McElroy v. Schultz et al
as 1:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
- Schultz, A. W. Kays, Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2007cv01677
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Knowles, C Chrones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
