Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ZEVA v. EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2021cv09859
Defendant:
EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC., LEI CHEN and DONG HU
Plaintiff:
KONSTANTIN ZEVA
ZEVA v. EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv09859
Defendant:
EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC., LEI CHEN and DONG HU
Plaintiff:
KONSTANTIN ZEVA and Brijesh Bhagat
Petitioner:
RONALD ANTOSKO, Elad Rachevsky, XIANDE YANG and others
Zaker v. Ebang International Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Ebang International Holdings Inc., Lei Chen and Dong Hu
Plaintiff:
Tommie Zaker
Lead Plaintiff:
Dr. Gowrisankar Naidu Galla
Petitioner:
GALLA Investments Inc., Yan Yuan, Brijesh Bhagat and others
Young v. US
as 21-1192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY C. WATSON, et al., BELLA LIANG, BONNIE ROSE SINGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Wei v. Pinduoduo Inc.
as 20-1423
Defendant:
Junyun Xiao, Jianming Yu, Haifeng Lin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Pinduoduo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yoen Hung, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Jiaxiang Wei, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johan Johan and Kerry Asay
Wei v. Pinduoduo Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07625
Defendant:
Jianming Yu, Junyun Xiao, Haifeng Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Jiaxiang Wei
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Li v. Xunlei Limited et al
as 1:2018cv00646
Defendant:
Xunlei Limited, Eric Zhou, Lei Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Peng Li
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re Xunlei Limited Securities Litigation
as 1:2018cv00467
Defendant:
Xunlei Limited, Eric Zhou, Lei Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Runcie Dookeran and Peng Li
Lead Plaintiff:
Tongyan Wang and Yuyan Jia
Petitioner:
Noelle Dunphy, Yuejun Jiang and Hesong Sun
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lei Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3333
Petitioner:
LEI CHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
