Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Integris Composites, Inc. v. Oxford
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Integris Composites, Inc.
Defendant:
Rowdy Lane Oxford
United States of America v. Lane et al
as 5:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mark Earl Lane and Cynthia W Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. LANE
as 1:2015mc00034
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
FREDDIE LANE, JR.
AgCarolina Farm Credit, ACA v. Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms, et al
as 5:2014cv00856
Plaintiff:
AgCarolina Farm Credit, ACA
Defendant:
Brantley Farms, Inc. , ERW Farms, LLC , Nichols & Nichols Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
USA v. Barnett
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gary Lane Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LANE
as 5:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORRAINE W. LANE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LANE
as 4:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORRAINE W. LANE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P. v. INFUSION CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPRATION et al
as 1:2009mc00051
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant:
INFUSION CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPRATION and INVESTMENT CAPITAL HOLDINGS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LANE et al
as 1:2009mc00044
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT E. LANE, WEALTH POOLS INTERNATIONAL, INC., RECRUIT FOR WEALTH, INC. and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. McCorkle
as 3:2008cv00038
Defendant:
Britton Lane McCorkle and B.H.B. Enterprieses, Inc. d/b/a Vinnie's Sardines Southend
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
