Other Statutes Cases
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05391
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Brandon Fake, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1113
Plaintiff: BRANDON L. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and CAITLIN B. FAKE
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04645
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 21-2314
Plaintiff / Appellant: DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Diana Anhalt, et al
as 20-3393
Defendant: JUDGE DIANA LOUISE ANHALT, JUDGE LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, JUDGE LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Defendant / Appellee: LAWRENCE O'CONNOR, Esq., SUPERVISING JUDGE LEON W. TUCKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE IDEE FOX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1967
Defendant / Appellee: TRACY TRIPP, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DERRICK U. JACOBS
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant: WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff: CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?