Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
John Demos, Jr. v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr., DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP and others
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joseph Moreno v. USA
as 20-1232
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. MORENO
Eileen M. Moreno v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01551
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eileen M Moreno
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Moreno et al
as 2:2017cv00680
Defendant:
EL Chamizal, LLC, Juan M Moreno and Maria Luna Valle
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Alicia Garza Sandoval et al v. Matthew R. Jennings et al
as 2:2010cv04837
Plaintiff:
Charles Amador, Barbara Coppel, Maria Rojas Corona and others
Defendant:
American Restaurant Concepts, Inc., Bear Industrial Holdings, Inc., Capital Asset Lending, Inc. and others
Gerardo Soto v. City of Moreno Valley et al
as 2:2009cv06257
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Soto and Gerardo Soto
Estate Defendant:
City of Moreno Valley
Defendant:
Moreno Valley Police Department, County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Moreno et al
as 3:2009cv01924
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sonia M. Moreno and Alfredo M. Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
