Cases 1 - 6 of 6
White McLaughlin v. MA Dep't of Elementary and Secondary Education, et al
as 21-1001
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY, INC., Board of Directors, CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAHRIS DIANNE WHITE MCLAUGHLIN
Dighton-Rehoboth Regional School District v. Mass. Dept. Elementary and Secondary Education., et al
as 1:2013cv11365
Plaintiff:
Dighton-Rehoboth Regional School District
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Mitchell D. Chester, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
M., et al v. King Philip Regional School, et al
as 11-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEBASTIAN M., LISA M., as Legal Guardian and Parent and MICHAEL M., as Legal Guardian and Parent
Defendant - Appellee:
KING PHILIP REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, and its Bureau of Special Education Appeals
L.P. et al v. Longmeadow Public Schools et al
as 4:2010cv40190
Defendant:
Longmeadow Public Schools, Bureau of Special Education Appeals of the MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Plaintiff:
P. P. and L. P.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Bohanan v. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education et al
as 1:2010cv10897
Plaintiff:
David R. Bohanan
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Sutton School District and Sutton School Committee
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Springfield School Committee v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv30132
Plaintiff:
Springfield School Committee
Defendant:
Quetzal Doe, The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and The Bureau of Special Education Appeals
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
