Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation et al v Smith Design Studios
as 1:2023cv05670
Plaintiff:
Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation and Law Offices of Ronald I. Kaplan, MD, LLC
Defendant:
Smith Design Studios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Kabakibou
as 1:2019cv05340
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kamal Kabakibou, MD,PC and Kamal Kabakibou, MD,PC doing business as The Center for Pain Management
United States of America v. Kabakibou
as 1:2019mi00152
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kamal Kabakibou, MD,PC
Patel et al v. Crist et al
as 1:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Richard Crist, Allstate Insurance Company, Office of the New Jersey Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Harshad Patel and Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clopton et al v. Burwell et al
as 1:2015cv04388
Plaintiff:
Charles Clopton, Jr. , C.V. Clopton, Jr., MD, PC and Camp Creek Primary Care, PC
Defendant:
Sylvia Matthews Burwell , Andrew Slavitt and CAHABA GBA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AUSTIN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012mc00004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AUSTIN, MAVERICK ENTERPRISES INC, M AUSTIN LP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DALLAYLLAH BUNTING
Healix Infusion Therapy Inc v. Craig E Smith MD PC et al
as 7:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
Healix Infusion Therapy Inc
Defendant:
Craig E Smith MD PC et al and Craig E Smith MD PC et al
Smith et al v. Copeland et al
as 1:2009cv01200
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, Jr., Joel Smith, Jr., Joel Smith, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert Price Copeland, James Stephen Quay, Robert Patrick Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
