Cases 1 - 10 of 377
SCHILLING v. MACDONALD et al
as 2:2024cv06680
Plaintiff:
MIKE SCHILLING
Defendant:
GUY MACDONALD, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C. GILMAN and others
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Darren MacDonald v. Ybarra Professional Builders
as 5:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
Ybarra Professional Builders
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1042
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Hall v. Annucci
as 24-701
Plaintiff:
RALPH HALL
Defendant:
ANTHONY ANNUCCI, DOCCS Commissioner, in his official and personal capacity, GRIFFIN, GHCF Medical Supervisor, in his official, Dr. BENTIVEGNA, GHCF Medical Supervisor, in his official and personal capacity and others
Glover v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Department
as 24-630
Plaintiff:
KELLY GLOVER
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ONONDAGA COUNTY, DOMINICK ALBANESE, both individually and in his official capacity as an Onondaga County Sherrif's Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
