Cases 1 - 10 of 296
USA v. Magana-Medrano
as 24-50716
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Ramon Magana-Medrano
Echeverria Magana v. Garland
as 24-4051
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS ECHEVERRIA MAGANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dobronski v. Younghorse
as 2:2024cv11482
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
George Magana Younghorse Doing business as Signzdrect
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 4:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Joann Maxwell, Denise Paul and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Hernandez Favila, Maria Concepcion Mendieta Santos, Luis Enrique Martin Del Campo Valencia and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger, I
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fields v. Foss, et al.
as 24-2377
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE SHAWN DUPREE FIELDS
Defendant:
C. CALDERON, S. ALVAREZ, D. MAGANA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cavazos v. Garsilaso, et al.
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant:
N. GARSILASO, J. TREJO, G. GONZALES and others
Bellantoni v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as NYE/1:24-CV-01558
Plaintiff:
Bellantoni and Alessandra Bellantoni
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One, N.A.
Petitioner:
Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
PORT v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
as NJ/3:24-CV-01006
Plaintiff:
PORT and HOWARD PORT
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
Petitioner:
Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Pitts v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as OHS/3:24-CV-00047
Plaintiff:
Pitts and Shantell Pitts
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One, N.A.
Petitioner:
Scott C. Savett, Sheryl Barnes, Samuel Hans and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
