Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Caraffa v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1495
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, STATE OF ARIZONA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
John Sullivan, Jr. v. Missouri Dept of Corrections, et al
as 21-2198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John J. Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, LLC, John Doe, Male Nurse and Missouri Department of Corrections
Fine v. UConn Medical
as 20-4148
Defendant / Appellee:
Adams, CO, Whitehead, CO, J. Carrara, Male Nurse and others
Defendant:
Jane Does, Nurses 1, 2, 3, John Does, Nurses 1, 2, Jane and John Does, 1-27 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Fine, Jr.
Montez Dunklin v. Doctor Bemesida, et al
as 20-2417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEZ DUNKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, 1 male nurse, DOCTOR BEMESIDA, JANE DOES, 2 female nurses and others
Donald Chapman v. Jefery Alverez, et al
as 19-17170
Defendant / Appellee:
KETURAH F. VOLPE, Provider, VANESSA, Wound Care Nurse at C.H.S., MARTHA TOTHILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD KEITH CHAPMAN
Donald Chapman v. Jefery Alverez, et al
as 19-15521
Defendant / Appellee:
KETURAH F. VOLPE, Provider, VANESSA, Wound Care Nurse at C.H.S., MARTHA TOTHILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD KEITH CHAPMAN
Christopher Lancaster v. USDC-CARIV
as 17-73003
:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN MALE NURSE, individual & official capacity, PRICE, individual, PRICE, Nurse-official capacity and others
Christopher Lancaster v. Warden Richard B. Ives et al
as 5:2017cv00927
Respondent:
Acting Warden Unknown Associate, Case Manager Coordinater Ms. Ragosa, Duty Officer Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
