Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Covey v. Konnektive Corp. et al
as 1:2022mi00074
Plaintiff:
A. Cyclone Covey
Defendant:
Konnektive Corp., Konnektive LLC, Konnektive Rewards LLC and others
Jeffrey Lapinske, et al v. City of Grand Haven, MI, et al
as 21-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAPINSKE, CASSANDRA LAPINSKE, JEFFREY LAPINSKE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, ex rel, People of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GRAND HAVEN, MI
Tan v. Quick Box, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01082
Defendant:
Health & Body Care TN, Inc., Skin Beauty & Health JN, Inc., EW Radiant Skin Store, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Vibrant Face & Beauty Shop ATN, Inc., Diet and Beauty Enterprise JB, Inc., Beautiful Skin and Health SL, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chad Biggins, Stephen Adele and Konnektive Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Matthew Martorano, James Martell, Kathryn Martorano and others
Plaintiff:
LeAnne Tan
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rocket Management Group, LLC and Kiet Liu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. George Martorano
as 11-2864
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE MARTORANO
E.R. James Real Estate Services, LLC et al v. Spinell et al
as 1:2011cv04476
Plaintiff:
E.R. James Real Estate Services, LLC , Edward R. James Partners, LLC , Edward R. James Homes, LLC and others
Defendant:
Steve Spinell , Jeanne Martini , Lindsay Pitcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony R. Martorano, et al. v. Carey Canada, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:81-CV-02488
Defendant:
Carey Canada, Inc
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Martorano
MARTORANO et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:80-CV-03573
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MARTORANO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
