Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David v. British American Tobacco p.l.c et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Gary David
Defendant:
British American Tobacco p.l.c, Jack Marie Henry David Bowles, Tadeu Marroco and others
Marie Henry v. City of Mount Dora, et al
as 21-14120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MOUNT DORA, BRETT LIVINGSTON, In his Official and Individual Capacities, T. RANDALL SCOGGINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities and others
Marie Henry v. ExamWorks Inc., et al
as 20-12268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
EXAMWORKS CLINICAL SOLUTIONS LLC and EXAMWORKS INC.
Joseph Gaines v. Mary Henry, et al
as 20-15692
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY HENRY, Culinary Manager at LCC and ADAMSON, Medical Doctor at LCC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GAINES
Olds et al v. PCA Aquisitions V, LLC
as 1:2018cv02769
Plaintiff:
Clara Olds , Jorge Villarreal , Mary Henry and others
Defendant:
PCA Aquisitions V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
US v. Linda Henry
as 16-4213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA MARIE HENRY, a/k/a Malak Abdulla Bey
Gbe-Giizhig v. Henry et al
as 1:2016cv10868
Plaintiff:
Chad Jerami Avery Gbe-Giizhig
Defendant:
Teresa Marie Henry and Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Natalie Pappas, et al v. Naked Juice Co. of Glendora
as 14-55341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATALIE PAPPAS, an individual, on her own behalf, on behalf of the general public, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RUSSELL MARCHEWKA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CHRISTOPHER EVANS, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
BRADLEY LEWIS HENRY and SARAH MARIE HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
NAKED JUICE CO. OF GLENDORA, INC., a California Corporation
Nettie Marie Henry v. Cooper Industries, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-64188
Plaintiff:
Nettie Marie Henry
Defendant:
Cooper Industries
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
