Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff: Jeremy Pinson
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
In re: Pitts
as 23-1244
Petitioner: EDGAR NELSON PITTS
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISONS, CUNDIFF, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff: SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
TROYA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff: DANIEL TROYA
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Noe v. Matevousian, et al
as 21-1373
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER GEORGE NOE
Defendant / Appellee: ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, individually and in his official capacity and DALE BILBREY, individually and in his official capacity
Pittman v. Gomez
as 21-1114
Petitioner / Appellant: DARNELL PITTMAN, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ
John Doe v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 20-16752
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS R. KANE, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, DEVIN BLOCHER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE
Adams v. Matevousian We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1273
Respondent / Appellee: MATEVOUSIAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: ERIC ADAMS
Michael Benanti v. D. Alatary, et al
as 20-15686
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL BENANTI
Defendant: MATEVOUSIAN, Warden
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS MOORE and D. ALATARY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?