Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gordana Schifanelli v. Queen Anne's County Board of Commissioners
as 21-1942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDANA SCHIFANELLI
Defendant / Appellee:
QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, in his official and individual capacity, MATTHEW EVANS, in his official and individual capacity, CHRISTINE BETLEY, in her official and individual capacity and others
Matthew Evans v. USA
as 20-3080
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW EVANS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brian Evans v. Kevin Lindsey
as 19-1394
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN MATTHEW EVANS
Donald Wortman, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 18-80097
Defendant - Petitioner:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARGARET GARCIA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Reilly et al v. Levin et al
as 1:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
James P. Reilly and Victoria Jelderks
Defendant:
Matthew A. Levin , Shannon L. Armstrong , Mark A. Fleischauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Donald Wortman, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 15-15362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
USA v. Joseph Evan
as 11-30521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MATTHEW EVANS
Donald Wortman, et al v. Vietnam Airlines, et al
as 11-16425
:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant:
AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VIETNAM AIRLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
