Cases 1 - 10 of 51
US v. Michael Collins
as 23-4395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE COLLINS
Christopher Johnson v. Todd Ishee
as 21-6296
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL C. COLLINS, Unit Manager, Caledonia Correctional, MS. MASON, Superintendent, Caledonia Correctional, RANDELL RICHARDSON, Correctional Officer, Caledonia Correctional and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 21-8002
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee
Appellant:
LYNN SCHADT THOMAS and WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8039
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR. and LYNN SCHADT THOMAS
Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee and CENTENNIAL BANK
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8038
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee
Appellant:
LYNN SCHADT THOMAS and WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8034
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8020
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Cross Appellant:
LYNN SCHADT THOMAS
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8018
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee and LYNN SCHADT THOMAS
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
In re: William Harold Thomas
as 20-8009
Debtor:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Appellee:
GLANKLER BROWN, PLLC, Former Counsel to the Debtor, MICHAEL EDWARD COLLINS, Trustee and PAUL A. RANDOLPH, Acting United States Trustee, Region 8
Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD THOMAS, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
