Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00553
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Da Silva Neto v. Bondi
as 25-1207
Petitioner: MELODIVO FRANCISCO DA SILVA NETO
Respondent: PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General
De Moura Neto, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4840
Petitioner: AURORA TONARE BRAGA DE MOURA, JOAO AUGUSTO DE MOURA NETO and CLAIRE MARTINS DA SILVA MUNIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pereira Neto, et al v. Garland
as 24-1058
Petitioner: CONSTANTINO PEREIRA NETO and SURAYA SILVESTRE PEREIRA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Geraldo De Souza-Moreno Neto, et al v. U.S. Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-14113
Petitioner: GERALDO DE SOUZA-MORENO NETO, LAURICIA VIVIANY SOUSA-MORENO, ANTONELLA SOUSA-MORENO and others
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02820
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v.DA COSTA NETO
as 1:2023cv02451
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: ROMERO CABRAL DA COSTA NETO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00311
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Martin Viveros We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-10215
Defendant / Appellant: MARTIN VIVEROS, also known as Don Neto, also known as Rodolfo Dominguez-Rosas
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?