Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 608
State of Alaska, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 24-3148
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALASKA and NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
GRAY et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2024cv01431
Plaintiff: TILMAN GRAY doing business as AVON SEAFOOD and SLASH CREEK WATERWORKS, INC.
Defendant: GINA M. RAIMONDO and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity
Interested Party: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Appellant: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Interested Party: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05296
Plaintiff: Wild Fish Conservancy and Wild Salmon Rivers d/b/a The Conservation Angler
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Environmental Protection Information Center, et al. v. van Atta, et al.
as 24-2210
Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and FRIENDS OF THE SHASTA RIVER
Defendant: ALICIA VAN ATTA, JIM SIMONDET and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02576
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defense Council and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Environmental Protection Information Center, et al. v. van Atta, et al.
as 24-1813
Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and FRIENDS OF THE SHASTA RIVER
Defendant: ALICIA VAN ATTA, in her official capacity, Assistant Regional Administrator, California Coastal Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, JIM SIMONDET, in his official capacity, Contact, California Coastal Office, National Marine Fisheries Service and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, California Coastal Office
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff: COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORRO, THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, CRAIG RUCKER and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF OCEAN MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?