Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Singh v. Garland
as 22-6019
Petitioner: NIRMAL SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nirmal Singh v. William Barr
as 19-71636
Petitioner: NIRMAL SINGH
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Singh v. Barr
as 19-726
Petitioner: Nirmal Singh
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01135
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Singh v. Holder
as 14-695
Petitioner: Nirmal Singh
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Kevin Doan, et al v. Nirmal Singh, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-16980
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN DOAN and PAULINE DOAN
Defendant - Appellee: NIRMAL SINGH, NACHATTAR S. CHANDI, SUSANA E. CHANDI and others
Doan et al v. Singh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00531
Defendant: Nirmal Singh , Nachhattar S. Chandi , Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff: Kevin Doan and Pauline Doan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. Singh et al
as 1:2013at00215
Defendant: Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff: Kevin Doan and Pauline Doan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mehroke et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2013at00352
Defendant: Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff: Kulvir S Mehroke, Bhajan Singh and Kamboj LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mehroke et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2013at00353
Defendant: Nirmal Singh, Nachhattar S. Chandi, Susana E. Chandi and others
Plaintiff: Kulvir S Mehroke , Bhajan Singh and Kamboj LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?