Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Doe v. Town of Mount Pleasnt et al
as 2:2022cv02365
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
Town of Mount Pleasnt, Officer Shawn Fillian and Officers Jane and John Smith 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rickel v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 0:2020cv01127
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, SAF/MRBD (PDBR) The Office the Secretary United States Air Force and others
Plaintiff:
Quin Adam Rickel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Bey v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc et al
as 3:2018mc00265
Plaintiff:
Roy El Shamar Kareem Riley Bey
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans Inc, Bank of America, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Bey v. Schwedo et al
as 3:2018mc00263
Plaintiff:
Roy El Shamar Kareem Riley Bey
Defendant:
Kevin A. Shwedo, Clerk of Cort, Leon Lott and others
Gonzalez v. Butts County Georgia et al
as 2:2013mc00491
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Butts County Georgia, Butts County Sheriff's Office, M Overby and others
London 1 LLC v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
London 1 LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Chief Appeals Officer and National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perez v. Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
as 6:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Agustin Perez
Defendant:
Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ridley v. Scott Lowery Law Office PC
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Charles B Ridley, III
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Office PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bahas v. Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
as 6:2011cv03341
Plaintiff:
Michael Bahas
Defendant:
Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
