Other Statutes Cases filed in Wisconsin
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Seippel
as 2:2021cv00214
Plaintiff: United States and United States of America
Defendant: Phillip Seippel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00907
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00024
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leah Bitar v. REV Group Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01268
Defendant: Justin Fish, Jean Marie Canan, REV Group Inc and others
Plaintiff: Leah Bitar, Ramanitharan Rajaram and Seth Marinoff
Petitioner: Houston Municipal Employees Pension System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ramanitharan Rajaram v REV Group Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01270
Defendant: Justin Fish, Jean Marie Canan, Stifel Nicolaus & Company Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Ramanitharan Rajaram
Petitioner: Houston Municipal Employees Pension System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Steffek v. Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00239
Defendant: Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff: Sarah Steffek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00940
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?