Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC. et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff: ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Application of the New York Times CompanyIn re: Application of the New York Times Company
as 23-5071
In Re: In re: Application of the New York Times Company and Charlie Savage for Access to Certain Dockets, Orders, Legal Briefing, and Argument Transcripts Ancillary to January 6 Grand Jury Proceedings and Application of Politico and Kyle Cheney to Unseal All Documents Related to the January 6 Grand Jury Investigation
Petitioner: New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Petitioner / Appellant: POLITICO, LLC and Kyle Cheney, Senior Legal Affairs Reporter
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records
as 23-5073
In Re: In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings Ancillary to Certain Grand Jury Proceedings Concerning Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization
Petitioner / Appellant: Bloomberg L.P., Cable News Network, Inc., The E.W. Scripps Company and others
Petitioner: CBS Broadcasting, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, The Associated Press and others
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Cable News Network, Inc., et alIn re: Cable News Network, Inc., et al
as 22-3012
In Re: In re: Cable News Network, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, Associated Press and others
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner: MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae: TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor: JURORS
KUPPERMAN v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03224
Plaintiff: CHARLES M KUPPERMAN and CHARLES M. KUPPERMAN
Defendant: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A., CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NANCY PELOSI and others
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC, et al
as 1:2019mc00174
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC,
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES CO, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL T. FLYNN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00029
In Re: APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC
Petitioner: NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Respondent: ROGER STONE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?