Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ames v. Radzimski et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Judge Lech J Radzimski, Wesley Bruce Ames, Stanley Roy Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Spokane Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Ferguson
Defendant:
Spokane superior Court, Callalily Q Ferguson, Jared B Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hoyt et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hoyt, Maureen Urbach, James Urbach and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., A2Z Development Center, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Guerrero et al v. Charles Schwab & Co Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00446
Claimant:
Peter Leon Guerrero, Emilie Dawson, Robert LaCanfora and others
Respondent:
Interactive Brokers, LLC and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co Inc and Interactive Brokers LLC
Plaintiff:
Shannon A McQuery, Stephen W Apt, Eugene T Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2018cv01122
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN RAGHEBI, OneAmerica, MALAYEEN AHMED and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
