Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Pastora Orellana-Madrid v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1396
Petitioner:
PASTORA ISABEL ORELLANA-MADRID and D.S.A.O.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In re: New York City Board of
as 20-972
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pastora Soto
Cespedes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-21538
Plaintiff:
Pastora Cespedes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Nicolas Pastora v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-2095
Petitioner:
NICOLAS R. PASTORA, a/k/a Nicholas Pastora-Hernandez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
PROPHET et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
SANDRA PROPHET , C. P. , LANITA LOGAN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
United States of America v. Pastora
as 1:2011cv22637
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Eddie Pastora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robleto-Pastora, et al v. Holder
as 07-71492
Petitioner:
JORGE FILADELFO ROBLETO-PASTORA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER, ET AL and AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, ET AL, Chaldean Federation of America, Central American Legal Assistance, Immigration Counseling Service, Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel; Immigration Law Clinic, UC Davis; Immigration Legal Services, Washington D.C; Immig
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
