Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC
as 4:2015mc00154
Movant:
American Direct Marketing Resources, LLC
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Licensing, LLC and LPL Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
AAA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Swink v. University of Phoenix et al
as 4:2013cv00461
Plaintiff:
Del-Rio Swink
Defendant:
The Receivable Management Services Corporation and The University of Phoenix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Erdman Company v. Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC
as 4:2012mc00613
Plaintiff:
Erdman Company
Defendant:
Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC
Miscellaneou:
CBIZ Valuation Group, Inc.
Movant:
CBIZ Valuation Group, Inc. , John Rimar and Linda Atkinson
Erdman Company et al v. Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC et al
as 4:2012mc00050
Movant:
CBIZ Valuation Group, Inc. and Mercy Health
Plaintiff:
Erdman Company and Erdman Architecture & Engineering Company
Defendant:
Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC and Phoenix Health, LLC
Scott v. Dann et al
as 4:2011cv01707
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Crystal A. Dann and University of Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
