Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Leyva v. Bascai, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Leyva
Defendant:
Bascai, Inc., DOES 1-10 and Kao Chi Ping Chen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Li v. Ichiro Sushi, Inc.
as 20-1783
Defendant / Appellee:
New Ichiro Sushi Inc., DBA Ichiro Sushi Restaurant, Hui Chen and Juhang Wang, AKA James Wang
Counter Claimant:
Ichiro Asian Fusion, Inc., DBA Ichiro Fusion and Jian Ping Chen
Defendant:
Winson Chan, John Doe, Vincent Chan and others
Appellant:
Ji Li, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Bin Zhang, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Jianhui Wu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Appellee:
Roberto Hidalgo
Chen v. Sessions
as 18-1205
Petitioner:
Cui Ping Chen, AKA Annie Duong
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Cree, Inc. v. Linemart, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07150
Defendant:
Wen Ping Chen, Does, Linemart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cree, Inc.
Chen v. Sessions
as 17-549
Petitioner:
Ping Chen
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 14-791
Petitioner:
Yan Ping Chen, AKA Yang Ping Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Wu (Chen)
as 13-4013
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lin Wu, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Ying Chen, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Jessica, Ze Yu Zhu, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Jie Yu and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Yu Chen, AKA Sealed Defendant 11, AKA Cantonese Guy
Chen v. Holder
as 13-1936
Petitioner:
Ping Chen, AKA Ai Ling Neo
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 12-3164
Petitioner:
Ji Ping Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 12-2442
Petitioner:
Li Ping Chen, AKA Sharon Wen-Yee Chan
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
