Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pope v. Memorial Hermann Health System
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tonia D. Pope
Defendant:
Memorial Hermann Health System
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hirschback Motor Lines, Inc. et al v. Smarttruck Undertray Systems, LLC. et al
as 3:2018mc00229
Defendant:
Mike Henderson, Steven S. Ingham Jr., Ron Pope and others
Plaintiff:
Hirschback Motor Lines, Inc. and Brad Pinchuk
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vanblaricum et al
as 4:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Chet Inglis, James Vanblaricum, Matthew Leaverton and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vanblaricum et al
as 3:2018xc01647
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James Vanblaricum, Rodney Pope, Chet Inglis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Pope v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2018mc00004
Plaintiff:
Denise Pope
Defendant:
Galveston County, Boone Chapman, Soluta Health and others
Lathem v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marion Lathem , Nathan Pope , Jeremiah Brown and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV, VM Motori SpA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
