Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Sheila Guidry, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 20-90043
Petitioner:
Bates Whiteside, Vanessa Wilson, Sheila Guidry, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Dow Chemical Company, Praxair, Incorporated, Department of Environmental Quality State of Louisiana and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LINDE INC.
as 3:2020cv15103
Defendant:
LINDE INC. and PRAXAIR, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LINDE INC.
as 2:2020cv15103
Defendant:
LINDE INC. and PRAXAIR, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
LINDE AG et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LINDE AG and PRAXAIR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sheila Guidry, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 19-90029
Not Yet Classified:
BATES WHITESIDE, VANESSA WILSON, SHEILA GUIDRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED, STEVE MILLIGAN and others
Communities for a Better Environment v. Praxair, Inc.
as 2:2019cv05270
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Communities for a Better Environment
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Louie Hassan v. Praxair, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv02811
Defendant:
DOES and Praxair, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Louie Hassan
SUBPOENA OF JULIE M. CAREY et al v. PRAXAIR, INC. et al
as 1:2018mc00034
Movant:
PRAXAIR, INC. and JULIE M. CAREY
Plaintiff:
CHINA PETROCHEMICAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
PRAXAIR, INC., ANNE ROBY, JOHN PANIKAR and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
China Petrochemical Development v. Praxair Inc
as 1:2018mc10040
Plaintiff:
China Petrochemical Development
Defendant:
Praxair Inc
Movant:
Graham Stevens and Praxair Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
