Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc.
as 24-853
Plaintiff:
JERIEL ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PRIVATE PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NLRB v. Xcel Protective Services, Inc.
as 22-1295
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Xcel Protective Services, Inc.
Xcel Protective Services, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-1264
Petitioner:
Xcel Protective Services, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Elias Nasiri v. TAG Security Protective Svcs., et al
as 21-16543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIAS NASIRI, individually, and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorney Generals Act
Defendant / Appellee:
T.A.G. SECURITY PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., PERSONNEL STAFFING GROUP, LLC, DBA KBS Staffing, Inc., ANTHONY MURGA, Director of T.A.G. Security Protective Services, Inc. and others
Comprehensive Security, Inc, et al v. Metro Gov't of Nashville
as 21-5617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ONTRAC SECURITY, LLC, ASSOCIATED PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. and COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Service Employees Internation v. Preeminent Protective Service
as 19-7157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ
Defendant / Appellant:
Preeminent Protective Services Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
