Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA v. David Valentine
as 23-2133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID R. VALENTINE
Allen Farmer v. Gary M. Lanigan, et al
as 20-3549
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN RIORDAN, F. MARTIN, CAPTAIN ALPHONSO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN J. FARMER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organizat
as 15-3135
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Eva Waldman, Revital Bauer, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs Yehonathon Bauer, Binyamin Bauer, Daniel Bauer and Yehuda Bauer, Shaul Mandelkorn and others
Defendant:
Yasser Arafat, Marwin Bin Khatib Barghouti, Ahmed Taleb Mustapha Barghouti, AKA Al-Faransi and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority, AKA Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority and or Palestinian Council and or Palestinian National Authority
Movant:
Charles Blau, Michael R. Bromwich, Rudolph Giuliani and others
USA v. Lawrence Valentine
as 11-10319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Lawrence Valentine v. Rodney Chandler
as 09-71233
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
RODNEY CHANDLER
Lawrence Valentine v. USDC-CEF
as 09-70349
:
In re: LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
RODNEY CHANDLER
Valentine, et al v. Don Mills
as 08-70719
In Re:
In re: LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
TAFT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUITION and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
