Cases 1 - 9 of 9
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
S. Mendel v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-17380
Defendant / Appellee:
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C., a law firm, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Adminisrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified:
MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court:
In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Chuck Congdon, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 19-16309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JORGE ZUNIGA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RYAN COWDEN, ANTHONY MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC, a Delaware corporation and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70357
Undetermined:
RAISER, LLC, RAISER-CA LLC, UBER USA, LLC and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Other:
In re: DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Archie Overton, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 18-16610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC, UBER USA, LLC and others
Archie Overton, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 18-71321
:
In re: ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Petitioner:
ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC and UBER USA, LLC
Overton et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02166
Plaintiff:
Archie Overton and S. Patrick Mendel
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Raiser-CA LLC and Uber USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Gonzales v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02264
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Uber USA, LLC and Raiser-CA
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
