Cases 1 - 10 of 1,111
US v. Rojas-Tamayo
as 24-1565
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MIGUEL ANGEL ROJAS-TAMAYO
Rojas v. IJ Wireless Inc et al
as 1:2024cv04976
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
IJ Wireless Inc, Abidsa Begum and Emila Zoey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Bennett
as 24-3626
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SALGADO ROJAS
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent
Rojas v. Debt Relief Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04776
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group PLLC, Law Office of Peter M. Daigle, P.C., The, Debt Relief Advocates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv04381
Defendant:
J. Mandella Barnes, Mandela Barnes, Mandela Barnes for Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hernandez-Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3355
Petitioner:
RAQUEL ELIZETTE HERNANDEZ-DIAZ and ESTEVEN ROJAS-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rojas v. Greengrids LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04150
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Greengrids LLC and Launey Wray Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Joey Builders Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03958
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Joey Builders Inc. and Liel Levi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Molina Rojas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3010
Petitioner:
MAYRA MOLINA ROJAS and LESLIE PAHUAMBA MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rojas-Osegueda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2871
Petitioner:
KATHERYN MARIBEL ROJAS-OSEGUEDA and JOSE LEONARDO PORTILLO-ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
