Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woods v. O'Malley
as 24-1729
Plaintiff:
RONALD WOODS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Diggs v. Wood
as 21-1687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Diggs
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Ronald Wood, Chris Dubrey, Correctional Officer/Sergeant and T. Robare, Corrections Officer
Defendant:
Sgt. Justin D. Delisle and Kristen J. Delisle, Librarian
Anselmo v. Kirkpatrick
as 21-1467
Defendant:
Keysor, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Clinton Correctional Facility, A. Aubin, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Ronald Wood, Sergeant, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Conrad Lavarnway, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Edward Bressette, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Gregory Cassidy, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Anselmo
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. ILWU, et al
as 20-35037
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE SUHR, an individual, MIKE MCMURTREY, an individual, TODD ENGLERT, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLUMBIA EXPORT TERMINAL, LLC
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack v. Summit Tire & Auto Service, Inc. a/k/a Direct Tire & Auto Service Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02566
Defendant:
John Clifton, Summit Tire & Auto Service, Inc. a/k/a Direct Tire & Auto Service Incorporated, James Blalock and others
Plaintiff:
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
United States of America v. $3,800.00 United States Currency
as 1:2015mc00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$3,800.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Ronald Woods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
