Cases 1 - 10 of 21
State of GA, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF GA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of IN v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1636
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF IN
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of NY v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1630
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
Commonwealth of MA v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1629
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of IL v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF IL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF CA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
State of CA v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF CA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRI, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant - Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
:
UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
