Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Schnitzer Steel Industires, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10604
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Schnitzer Steel Industires, Inc. and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10295
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., Prolerized New England Company, LLC, Metals Recycling, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. National Grid et al
as 4:2020cv11491
Plaintiff:
United Steelworkers of America, Local 12003 and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
National Grid and Benefits Committee of National Grid USA Service Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Perales v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff Department et al et al
as 1:2017cv11509
Defendant:
Phil Daigneau, Sandra Hutchens, J. Pecot e.g and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United Steel Workers, Local 5696 et al v. Patrick et al
as 4:2010cv40058
Plaintiff:
United Steel Workers, Local 5696 , Teamsters, Local 127 , Karen Christie and others
Defendant:
Deval Patrick, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chao v. Robert's Steel Erectors, Inc.
as 1:2007mc10193
Petitioner:
Elaine L. Chao
Respondent:
Robert's Steel Erectors, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
